Cerambycoidea Forum
Cerambycoidea Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Cerambycidae Lamiinae
 Lamiini
 Malaysia: Marmaroglypha ringletensis

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

   Insert an Image File

   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
loongfah Posted - 16/06/2013 : 08:47:59

474.76 KB

Hi all

Have been away to Malaysia for a while. Many interesting cerambycids! Will be posted in due time.

This is a Pasoh specimen in the State of Negri Sembilan
11   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Beckey Posted - 10/05/2026 : 04:53:55
Marmaroglypha ringletensis Viktora, 2025
Francesco Posted - 04/01/2015 : 19:37:32
Very probable. In this Forum and BioLib you can found all pictures of this genus.
Xavier Posted - 04/01/2015 : 14:36:53
So, it could be a new species ?? (I don't see the large white band as on Marmaroglypha densepunctata Br.)
Xavier Posted - 04/01/2015 : 12:57:30
Andre Posted - 04/01/2015 : 12:52:13
Here a picture from the HT Marmaroglypha densepunctata Br., 1948
Francesco Posted - 04/01/2015 : 12:18:05
Considering all species I have got the description, it might only be Marmaroglypha densepunctata Breuning, 1948... of which I have got no description...

Concerning Lamiini, I agree with you Dan.
The tribe is so wide and their characters so poor (winged species, scape with apical cicatrix) that it might be divided in further groups, e.g. Agniini (with trapezoidal forehead), Phrissomini (wingless species, evidently related), Batocerini (open procoxae), etc.
I have searched to divide the genera of my collection, but the task is very difficult, due to the large number of species.

However, the division Lamiini (Lamia + Phrissomini) and Monochamini (all other genera) has no logical sense, since numerous genera of the supposed "Monochamini" (e.g. Epicedia, Parepicedia, Leprodera, Statioceros, Aristobia) are clearly more related to Lamia than to Monochamus.
dryobius Posted - 16/12/2014 : 17:18:55
I just posted a photo of the holotype of Marmaroglypha sumatrana Ritsema, under "Lamiinae types".
There is a strong resemblance to the species posted here, and I believe it is probably a Marmaroglypha and not Gyaritini.
Whether you prefer to use the tribal name "Monochamini" or "Lamiini", it doesn't matter much to me, however there are genera in this group which look a little like Mesosini at first glance, or perhaps some other tribe, such as Lamiini, but do not appear to be related to the Monochamus-like genera. They have short antennae and are somewhat globose in shape, such as Eusyntheta brevicornis.
I'll post some of my photos and see if anybody can help me identify a species, or vice versa.
Beckey Posted - 16/12/2014 : 15:15:25
Marmaroglypha species
Francesco Posted - 29/06/2013 : 23:07:09
In fact, it almost similar to this species.
Beckey Posted - 29/06/2013 : 04:28:40
I would like to inform the knowledge about this species.

The mid coxal cavity of my specimen closes to epimeron, so this species doesn't belong to the tribe Lamiini.

This beetle might be the tribe Gyaritini now I thought.
Beckey Posted - 16/06/2013 : 14:10:40
Rare.

I have only 1 specimen of it.

I think it belongs to the tribe Lamiini, but I don't know any more.

Cerambycoidea Forum © 2000-08 Snitz Communications Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07