| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| BillTyson |
Posted - 20/03/2015 : 01:12:32
18.35 KB
From N. Vietnam, Bac Me, June, 15mm Hope these new pics will help.
39.69 KB
25.98 KB |
| 11 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| BillTyson |
Posted - 23/03/2015 : 19:47:22
Thanks everyone. Sorry to create so many questions and problems. |
| jplami |
Posted - 23/03/2015 : 10:13:41
i think too it's this taxon |
| Vitali |
Posted - 23/03/2015 : 09:00:31
Seems to be Blepephaeus infelix (Pascoe, 1856).
It was discussed at the Forum earlier as well. |
| BillTyson |
Posted - 23/03/2015 : 02:56:46
very low, not even half the way up the coxae. |
| Bennyboymothman |
Posted - 22/03/2015 : 23:56:40
Me neither, not Blepephaeus multinotatus now.... |
| Francesco |
Posted - 22/03/2015 : 22:27:36
Is the prosternum between the procoxae lower (as most Cerambycids) or as high as the coxae? |
| Xavier |
Posted - 22/03/2015 : 17:52:16
On pictures you added, I don't recognize B. multinotatus. |
| Xavier |
Posted - 20/03/2015 : 21:13:24
Not easy with your picture, but I am agree with Ben : possibly, Blepephaeus multinotatus (Pic, 1925) |
| Bennyboymothman |
Posted - 20/03/2015 : 19:21:45
Similar to Blepephaeus multinotatus? |
| BillTyson |
Posted - 20/03/2015 : 15:11:37
I try for a better picture.
The elytral markings are in bands, not marks and are grey. The antennae are dark. |
| jplami |
Posted - 20/03/2015 : 11:21:04
it seems to be Cereopsius aureomaculatus Breuning, 1968 |
