| T O P I C    R E V I E W | 
              
                | Pierre | Posted - 07/01/2010 : 22:13:15 
  
 A female from the Dawna Range / Myanmar.
 35 mm
 | 
              
                | 15   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First) | 
              
                | nalslan | Posted - 07/03/2013 : 15:35:02 OK, now I got the paper.  Thank you, Francesco!
 Here's a picture for the tooth process.
 It's not so evident as the one in fig 24 of Komiya and Drumont (2007).  I guess it might be individual variation or sex differences, the fig 24 in the paper is a female, the one I posted is a male. Huh...
 
 
  53.84 KB
 | 
              
                | Francesco | Posted - 06/03/2013 : 15:50:11 
 quote:Ok, I send you.Originally posted by nalslan
 
 That will be great! Please send me the monographs. Thank you, Francesco!
 
  
 The toothed process should be in this point:
 
 
  133.83 KB
 | 
              
                | nalslan | Posted - 06/03/2013 : 15:22:06 That will be great! Please send me the monographs. Thank you, Francesco!
 
 BTW, is the red dot on the attached picture the place that I should check for your words "the apical margin of the prosternum has the toothed process". I'll try to have my friend to clean the specimen and repost it later.
 
 
  
 | 
              
                | Francesco | Posted - 06/03/2013 : 14:01:33 
 quote:I think yes but I do not understand if the apical margin of the prosternum has the toothed process.Originally posted by nalslan
 
 I have one I thought it is S. lividipennis which was collected from Guizhou China, but now I don't know.
 
 
 Have you got the monographs to this genus? If not, I can send it to you.
 | 
              
                | nalslan | Posted - 06/03/2013 : 09:48:00 
  
 I just found this post.
 I have one I thought it is S. lividipennis which was collected from Guizhou China, but now I don't know.
 
 | 
              
                | Pierre | Posted - 30/01/2013 : 19:18:16 Thank you Francesco, this is an oldie, indeed, and still unidentified... until now.
 | 
              
                | Francesco | Posted - 30/01/2013 : 17:17:11 Coming back to this old topic, the former picture shows a small but evident tooth at the apical margin of the prosternum.
 Thus, it is a female of Spinimegopis lividipennis (Lameere, 1920).
 | 
              
                | Pierre | Posted - 13/01/2012 : 20:38:24 
   Or this?
 | 
              
                | Pierre | Posted - 13/01/2012 : 20:37:24 
   I think you have to see the prosternal process. - This helps?
 | 
              
                | Francesco | Posted - 12/01/2012 : 21:25:29 Yes: it should observe if the prosternum has a posterior conspicuous tubercle or it is smooth.
 | 
              
                | Pierre | Posted - 12/01/2012 : 07:43:19 Hi all, thank you for coming back with this topic.
 Francesco, what do you need to see from the ventral side? Any particular detail?
 
 | 
              
                | Francesco | Posted - 11/01/2012 : 21:26:14 You are right: I have identified this species before reading the revision by Drumont & Komiya.
 Maybe S. kachina is a better ID, but I have to examine the ventral side
 | 
              
                | timoinsects | Posted - 11/01/2012 : 12:00:50 the colour is much darker, the specimen you showed is very light colour.
 | 
              
                | timoinsects | Posted - 11/01/2012 : 11:59:56 It's not Spinimegopis tibialis
 the size 35mm? is very short.
 Spinimegopis tibialis is much longer. Here's a photo of my specimen collected in S.E.Tibet, a female.
 
 | 
              
                | Francesco | Posted - 08/01/2010 : 09:57:42 Spinimegopis tibialis (White, 1853), described from North India but also known from Tibet and Nepal.
 A mountain species likely widespread in Myanmar too.
 |