Cerambycoidea Forum
Cerambycoidea Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Cerambycidae Cerambycinae
 unsorted Cerambycinae
 Nouvelle Zelande, Nesoptychias simpliceps
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
| More
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

cerambyphil
Member Rosalia

France
522 Posts

Posted - 03/02/2017 :  20:51:42  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote



Voici une étrange espèce que je ne peux résister à vous présenter !
taille = 29,5 mm

Je suis désolé Xavier, mais ma photo originale de l'étiquette est droite, je n'arrive pas à la télécharger dans le même sens !


Edited by - Capitaine on 04/02/2017 14:24:59

Xavier
Scientific Collaborator

France
9140 Posts

Posted - 03/02/2017 :  21:30:56  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Hop, magie
Cette espèce est superbe, merci du partage !

Edited by - Xavier on 03/02/2017 21:31:48
Go to Top of Page

dryobius
Member Rosenbergia

USA
1403 Posts

Posted - 03/02/2017 :  22:52:25  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
Broun (1880) described this species in the genus Blosyropus.

In 1883, Broun described a new genus and re-named B. simpliceps as Ptychopterus rugosus. However, Ptychopterus was already a genus of Cleridae.

In KIRKALDY, G. W. 1910, On some preoccupied generic names in insects. The Canadian Entomologist. page 8; proposed the replacement name of Nesoptychias for Ptychopterus.
Nesoptychias thus has priority over Pteroptychus Aurivillius, 1912.

If this is confusing, I understand.

Unfortunately, TITAN does not have the correct name. I would appreciate someone telling Gerard, as my emails to him usually fail.

The correct name should be Nesoptychias simpliceps (Broun, 1880)

Also, I do not understand how this came to be in Callidiopini. It is possibly related to Blosyropus as Broun originally stated.

Whatever the case is, both Nesoptychias and Blosyropus are nice looking cerambycids.
Go to Top of Page

Francesco
Forum Admin

Luxembourg
8268 Posts

Posted - 03/02/2017 :  23:17:48  Show Profile  Email Poster  Visit Francesco's Homepage  Reply with Quote
This genus should belong to Phlyctaenodini, as correctly reported in BioLib.
Go to Top of Page

Jérôme Sudre
Member Rosenbergia

France
1233 Posts

Posted - 06/02/2017 :  19:00:39  Show Profile  Email Poster  Reply with Quote
En effet comme l'écrit Dan ce genre ressemble beaucoup à Blosyropus. C'est un groupe très particulier.
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Send Topic to a Friend
 Printer Friendly
| More
Jump To:
Cerambycoidea Forum © 2000-08 Snitz Communications Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07