Posted - 26/05/2013 : 18:34:03 Francesco, thanks very much for pointing out that!
Posted - 26/05/2013 : 10:48:49 I agree, but I ignore the variability of this species. Your and the Russian specimen exactly correspond to the description given by Plavilstshikov (1934); BioLib specimen seems to be aberrant.
Pay attention that this species belongs to the subgenus Paraphymatodes, not Poecilium. Sama confounds these subgenera, which actually are different enough.