| Author |  Topic  |  | 
              
                | GerardScientific Collaborator
 
      
 
                France5441 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 21/05/2020 :  13:43:55       
 |  
                      |  255.86 KB
 
 Arménie, Syunik, Lehvaz
 
 Bonjour quelle est la différence entre
 Stictoleptura (Paracorymbia) fulva  (Degeer, 1775)
 Stictoleptura (Paracorymbia) tonsa  (K. Daniel & J. Daniel, 1891)
 |  
                      | Edited by - Xavier on 23/05/2020  08:46:09
 |  | 
              
                | XavierScientific Collaborator
 
      
 
                France12506 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 21/05/2020 :  15:42:32       
 |  
                      | Sur le meme site, fulva est ici, tonsa est la. |  
                      | Edited by - Xavier on 21/05/2020  15:43:13
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | FrancescoForum Admin
 
      
 
                Luxembourg9604 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 21/05/2020 :  21:51:17         
 |  
                      | La différence est ici, page, 269, mais je ne peux pas t'aider. 
 P.s. Paracorymbia est un genre, pas un sous-genre, comme Miroshnikov a répété ici.
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | GerardScientific Collaborator
 
      
 
                France5441 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 22/05/2020 :  07:05:25       
 |  
                      | Bonjour Francesco c'est en russe ! |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | MaxMember Rosalia
 
    
 
                Russia734 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 22/05/2020 :  23:09:48       
 |  
                      | In any case it could be recognized as "tonsa". From russian " This taxa (like next one - pallidipennis) can be accepted as subspecies of S. fulva with a high probability." By Danilevsky` opinon real fulva are occurring :
 "widespread in Western Europe from Portugal to Romania and Bulgaria, including Ireland, England, Sicily and Greece; In Scandinavia, there is absent; all data for Poland are erroneous (Ziarko, 1993); known from Slovakia; numerous S. fulva reports for different parts of Anatolia are associated with different local species; those specimens need to be reliably determined, but at least in Western Anatolia populations that are quite close to European S. fulva may occur. Characteristically, the S. fulva reports for Turkey often coincide geographically with the S. tonsa (or pallidipennis) reports, i.e., they belong to the same populations and probably to other close species, mostly S. excisipes" -sorry for my english
  So this beetle is common transcaucasian S. tonsa (for me at the moment).
 |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                | GerardScientific Collaborator
 
      
 
                France5441 Posts
 | 
                    
                      |  Posted - 24/05/2020 :  16:56:43       
 |  
                      | Thank you Many geographically speak it's tonsa for me, which is probably as Danilevsky thinks is a ssp de fulva. |  
                      |  |  | 
              
                |  |  Topic  |  |