| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| FraRug |
Posted - 19/12/2025 : 23:56:46
I came across this striking resemblance... 
Pachylocerus pilosus Guerin, 1844 (left) and Rhytidodera concolor Nonfried, 1895 (right).
More than a resemblance 
136.08 KB
(photo from Larry's site) |
| 5 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Xavier |
Posted - 23/12/2025 : 10:40:20
quote:
Originally posted by dryobius
Synonymy? Transference to a different genus is not synonymy. The two Pachylocerus illustrated here are very different. But the questions remains: is Nonfried's species something that was described previously, or maybe has someone else subsequently described it under another name?
Yes (I wrote too quickly) |
| dryobius |
Posted - 23/12/2025 : 01:26:03
Synonymy? Transference to a different genus is not synonymy. The two Pachylocerus illustrated here are very different. But the questions remains: is Nonfried's species something that was described previously, or maybe has someone else subsequently described it under another name? |
| Xavier |
Posted - 21/12/2025 : 15:02:18
La photo de cette espèce est sur le site du muséum de Belgique. Chacun a pu repérer cette synonymie évidente, mais personne n'a daigné la publier  . |
| FraRug |
Posted - 20/12/2025 : 18:25:14
Donc, plus qu'une simple suspicion! Merci pour l'information, Xavier. |
| Xavier |
Posted - 20/12/2025 : 12:00:39
Yes, most of Nonfried species are false. |
